A
great story - an interesting historical perspective
, but definitively a fictional one. Some of the interpretations
of the symbols in Art were extremely interesting but
arguably stretched. The many facts in the book make
you want to learn all about the truths of this world.
I found myself searching PHI , looking at Art that
I coincidentally downloaded a few weeks ago , reading
my Louvre art book , pulling my Da Vinci notes from
a previous book I read , reading the bible, reading
the apocrypha (also downloaded previously) , looking
up the Holy Grail . blah blah blah. This book definitely
created a whirlwind of interest for me.
Dan Brown , vague on his own faith but admitting himself
a christian , said that if people are taking interest
and debating about religion due to his book then this
is positive for religion. Apathy , in his opinion
, is religions enemy.
Some
rambling thoughts and notes I had about the book ......
(don`t
expect a cohesive argument , I`m not knowledgeable
enough)
He
interspersed enough eye-opening-facts within a framework
of far-fetched inferences to appear plausible , and
justified the inferences with illogical and weak arguments.
Ie; Jesus - a jew - is expected to be married because
bachelorhood amongs jews were looked down upon therefore
Jesus was married despite the lack of historical references
validating this audacious claim.
The claim that Jesus was not divine and was just a
teacher is a belief held by many; One cannot take
the Bible which declares Jesus to be Lord , dozens
of times and use the same book to hint at his lack
of divinity. The christian argument for Christs divinity
was that he believed He was God so either he is a
Liar , a Lunatic , or God. The historical Jesus proved
he was too great of a man and too great of a teacher
to be a lunatic. Lunatics do not act the way He did.The
christian stance is that you cannot call Jesus , just
a good man and teacher, He must be called Christ or
a Liar The Jews acknowledged Jesus called himself
God and called him a Liar and blasphemer and evenually
had him killed. I don`t believe Jesus was a liar ,
do you ? . The trinity is tough to swallow for most
christians not to mention other religions. I won`t
make pretend I can explain it well here , but poke
around some Christian websites to get a better explanation
of the belief in the Trinity.
Using
the apocrypha to attack christianity is not new either.
The fact that the church has not canonized the apocrypha
is not a conspiracy but a decision based on historical
reliability. As is usually complained by skeptics
or those that are confused about religion :"
The bible is man-made and written hundreds of years
after the fact "- This is true of the apocryphal
writings and gospels of Thomas , Phillip etc; This
is not true of the canonized gospels we know as the
new testament written between 34 -50 years of Christ`s
death.
-Dan
Brown`s books are obsessed with ancient societys which
are ripe for conspiracy theories. Illuminati , Priory
of Scion , Opus Dei , NAS , Cern, and the Masonic
society (which the codes hidden in the dust jacket
hints about , possibly his next book)
Most
people have heard about the freemasons , if you ask
any current members about it they will tell you that
there are no ideas about taking over the world , or
secret behind the scenes motives for the group. Most
meetings are actually boring and tedious. Is it possible
the ancient societies did originally have particular
secret agendas and have now evolved into commonplace
good will societies with no interesting stories?
**The
Goddess , or Sacred feminine - I didn`t yet google
the internet about her but I should. In the Doors
movie , Didn`t Jim Morrison marry under the goddess
to that dark haired chick reporter ? I know that the
goddess in many different guises has been worshipped
throughout history. Many sci-fi and fantasy books
speak of Godesses etc;
I would assume many women reading this book would
find it empowering. I agree that the world under Mens
control has not been ideal. If women had the same
stature in society as men , History may have been
written very differently. This book offered many interesting
ways that attitudes were changed over time. Left -
Evil - Woman - Eve - apple - evil - etc;
<>Da
Vinci is an enigma. An amazing man , his true life
story might be missing the Illuminary or Priory angles,
but is still interesting to look into. The advances
he made for a man of his time was amazing. He was
a genius in anatomy, optics , engineering , mechanical
inventions , science , and obviously Art. Some of
what he found and drew was not found and confirmed
and understood until the 19th and 20th centuries.
t is true that he was a prankster and not a great
fan of the church. He had a much more naturalistic
philosophy as many scientists did. He always sought
patrons to support him so He could spend time working
on what he wanted. He rarely finished anything , including
many commissions for church and the Kings who took
care of him.
-The
Amon L`isa - is an interesting angle and explanation
for the Mona Lisa smile. Some of Da Vinci`s character
attributes like ; his genius , tendency to do what
he wanted , intellectual pranks, keeping his life
private , sacriligious experiments and disections
etc would make him a great character to call a Priory
of Sion. But that would take away from all the evidence
there is that Da Vinci was agnostic , and probably
wouldn`t worship a Goddess nor a God. He believed
in evolution before there was a theory of evolution.
His naturalist philosophy does not lend credence to
his membership in a religious cult.
|